Premier League v Manchester City

Senior officials at the Premier League have been required to disclose emails, WhatsApp messages, and texts mentioning Manchester City. This order comes ahead of the November hearing into the 115 charges against the club. City, accused of concealing payments as sponsorship revenue, deny any wrongdoing according to The Times.

Legal Action and Internal Conflict

City’s legal action, led by chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak, has intensified the crisis within the Premier League. The club claims that the rules limiting payments from companies related to club owners are unlawful. This week’s hearing seeks to scrap these regulations before pursuing damages. This dispute has caused a rift among Premier League clubs, with some supporting the regulations to ensure fair market value for sponsorship deals, while others side with City.

The Charges Against Manchester City

The charges against City include 54 for providing inaccurate financial information from 2009-2018, 14 for inaccurate player and manager payment details, five for non-compliance with UEFA’s Financial Fair Play regulations, seven for breaching Premier League Profit and Sustainability Rules from 2015-2018, and 35 for failing to cooperate with investigations from December 2018 to February 2023. These allegations stemmed from leaked documents published by Der Spiegel.

Associated Party Transactions (APT) Rules

APT rules, introduced in December 2021, aim to ensure that sponsorship and commercial deals with club-connected companies are of fair market value. City argues these rules amount to discrimination and stifle their success. A successful challenge could remove constraints on inflated sponsorship deals and impact the 115 charges against the club.

Premier League’s Internal Divide

Premier League clubs are divided over the APT rules. While about 10-12 clubs support the regulations, others, including Newcastle United, Chelsea, Sheffield United, Nottingham Forest, and Everton, opposed the recent toughening of these rules. The controversy has led to a civil war within the league.

Potential Impact on City’s Defence

Monday’s private arbitration hearing precedes the independent hearing for City’s charges in November. Rival clubs fear that a victory for City in challenging the APT rules could bolster their defence against the 115 charges. It is alleged that City disguised payments from their owner, Sheikh Mansour’s Abu Dhabi United Group, as sponsorship revenue. If the tribunal rules the Premier League’s fair market value regulations unlawful, it could lead to new challenges against the charges.

The case illustrates the ongoing tension and the high stakes involved in maintaining financial integrity within the Premier League.

Share this article

Start Your Claim

We’re ready to start working with you


Call Us

Call our legal helpline to talk to an expert now.


Claim Online

Start your claim online and get started quickly.


Visit Us

Our offices are in Mossley Hill, Liverpool

Contact Us